So for the past week or so- probably longer- I've been thinking about the long discussion over on the
New England Cross list about categories, start times, etc. For the most part it's been a good discussion, but as always there is a lot of 'you should...' and not enough 'how about if I...' going on.
There is a lot of talk about using
Colin's amazing
CrossResults standings for the series call ups. Which is ok, the data is actually really cool- but nobody has pointed out that wranglin' all that data is simply one guys hobby. He's got a day job and his own racing to think about. Perhaps someone should ask him first before we draft him to be the call up czar for the entire series. I can assure you that bike racers tend to take themselves waaaay too seriously waaay too often. Do we want to subject poor Colin to the inevitable internet wrath of some dude who got called up on the 4th row instead of the 3rd row? If that data is worth using- and I think it might be- perhaps we might think about actually paying him for his work? And by "we" I mean the bike racers who are going to potentially benefit from the improved call up system.
On top of the whole "we should use Colin's data" thing, the annual "what about timing chips" discussion came up. Again, it's a legitimate question, and another good idea, but frankly nobody really gets the costs involved with implementing it. For
Pioneer to invest in a reliable chip timing system I would have to pass some portion of the cost along to the promoter. And the reality of that means I would have to charge some 5-6 times more for my services in scoring a cross race. So does the improved scoring/timing really justify that?
It makes me think a lot about how we (both the cycling community, and people in general) value things. And it makes me think that our value system might be out of whack. Is seems that the balance of what we want vs what we will pay for is off. And by "pay for" I don't just mean money- I mean time and effort as well. If you want better and more accurate timing and scoring at a race, will you pay more for an entry? If you want better call ups is that worth paying for on some level? If you want a race category or a type of course that's not currently being offered, are you willing to step up and put it on yourself?
There's some interesting comments about 'value', and what things are worth in
this article on Freeman Transport. It took me a bit to get past the hipster bandwagon track bike thing, but buried in there are some pretty good quotes, and I think some of those quotes can be applied to 'cross racing specifically, and bike racing in general. I guess what I mean is this: If you want something of quality- be it good results, good call ups, a good choice of categories there is a very real cost associated with it, and you need to be willing to bear those costs. To put it another way, if I can mangle a quote from the late
Al Kreitler: "The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweet taste of a deal."